Last night I saw a documentary wrt the topling of Mosadique as the Emperor of Iran by Shah Palavi through the CIA effort. Shah, intially was meant to take over from Mosadique who was anti-America, initially was a soft leader. America made him the great believer of making Iran as a capitalist State based on Amerrican and France model. Slowly, the CIA taught him to be a mild ditactor, to get thing under his controlled. His people quiet disagree with his style. With time he learnt fast and began to fight his own people and the American especially the oil companies to gain more for his empire build up. The people of Iran in fact played a very significant role in making Shah a hard dictator.
(2) At the rise of Shah Palavi, Ayatollah Komeni was a young man. He then matured and began to exert onto Shah to follow the the step of Islamic State management system. Later, Shah forced Khomeni to leave the State and the France in fact kept him as insurance. France could foresee, the Shah will exert high oil price presure onto the West, and that is when France began to make Khomeni more prominent and facilitate for the overthrow of Shah.
(3) If we study history of all the Big Men of the ancient and modern world, we will see, initially the leaders were very gentle, facilitating and down to earth. David, Solomon, Moses, even Muhammad SAW were never being hard with their people initially. But, overtime, they began to exert their authority based on reason merit at that time.
(4) Yasser Araffat, Sadam Husein, Ghadafi, Al Malik Husein, Assad, Fidel Castro, Fidel Marcos, Sukarno, Suharto, even Mahathir they were all soft, kind, caring, and considerate in their initial administration. Due to unecessary presure either of true purpose or otherwise, made them turned tough. They placed many into the cell. Even the Father of Democracy, America specially created the Guantanamo Prison to press hard onto the innocents when their interest were at stake. To some their act being seen as dictator. To some others, that was justified.
(5) These couple of years, we see Najib and Muhhyidin are working hard to manage the country welfare. Political disturbance either within their UMNO or BN component parties made them moved to the side track. It is in fact very unfortunate, at time where we should be building our nation, we quarrel over non-substance issues. Our fund should be spent for the development of the State, now had to be diverted to non-income generating matters, what a pitty?
(6) Worst now, an NGO calling themselves, Bersih, under the leadership of Ambiga (?) want to challenge the SPRM on the possibility of the dirty trick of the last election. The demonstration in Tunisia, Egypt, Yaman, Bahrain, Syria, Lebanon, Kuwait and many more became their learning experience. They believe, they can topple the governing team to surrender just like Mubarak and left the country. Is this legally and morally acceptable? We seem to behave like an Outlaw Country! If she is a true legal practitioner, why not she take it to the any and every court system that she can work on. Why take to the street?
(7) To me, the worst that could happen to this country is that with all these disturbance of the minorities, would make Najib-Muhyiddin into Hard Headed Leaders. They are now seem to be backup by certain quarters that are willing to flood the KL street with bloodshed. This is dangerous to the majority innocent. If this happen in fact we should be blamed, the majority allowing the minority to rule this country.
(8) Under current situation, just let the police and even the army to do their professional jobs. I would love to see, while doing so, they should just remain professional and not easily intimidated. Najib-Muhyiddin, I hope they remain focus to resolve our current economic problem. I have a strong believe, all these issues are wrt feeding one own pocket. But why should we allowed dirty hands of the minority to dirty the majority lives?
(9) I pray the police will remain professional, and hopefully with Allah blessing, there would be some hands from Him to curtail this unecessary disturbance to our peaceful lives.
Kuching, Sarawak
4 July, 2011
(2) At the rise of Shah Palavi, Ayatollah Komeni was a young man. He then matured and began to exert onto Shah to follow the the step of Islamic State management system. Later, Shah forced Khomeni to leave the State and the France in fact kept him as insurance. France could foresee, the Shah will exert high oil price presure onto the West, and that is when France began to make Khomeni more prominent and facilitate for the overthrow of Shah.
(3) If we study history of all the Big Men of the ancient and modern world, we will see, initially the leaders were very gentle, facilitating and down to earth. David, Solomon, Moses, even Muhammad SAW were never being hard with their people initially. But, overtime, they began to exert their authority based on reason merit at that time.
(4) Yasser Araffat, Sadam Husein, Ghadafi, Al Malik Husein, Assad, Fidel Castro, Fidel Marcos, Sukarno, Suharto, even Mahathir they were all soft, kind, caring, and considerate in their initial administration. Due to unecessary presure either of true purpose or otherwise, made them turned tough. They placed many into the cell. Even the Father of Democracy, America specially created the Guantanamo Prison to press hard onto the innocents when their interest were at stake. To some their act being seen as dictator. To some others, that was justified.
(5) These couple of years, we see Najib and Muhhyidin are working hard to manage the country welfare. Political disturbance either within their UMNO or BN component parties made them moved to the side track. It is in fact very unfortunate, at time where we should be building our nation, we quarrel over non-substance issues. Our fund should be spent for the development of the State, now had to be diverted to non-income generating matters, what a pitty?
(6) Worst now, an NGO calling themselves, Bersih, under the leadership of Ambiga (?) want to challenge the SPRM on the possibility of the dirty trick of the last election. The demonstration in Tunisia, Egypt, Yaman, Bahrain, Syria, Lebanon, Kuwait and many more became their learning experience. They believe, they can topple the governing team to surrender just like Mubarak and left the country. Is this legally and morally acceptable? We seem to behave like an Outlaw Country! If she is a true legal practitioner, why not she take it to the any and every court system that she can work on. Why take to the street?
(7) To me, the worst that could happen to this country is that with all these disturbance of the minorities, would make Najib-Muhyiddin into Hard Headed Leaders. They are now seem to be backup by certain quarters that are willing to flood the KL street with bloodshed. This is dangerous to the majority innocent. If this happen in fact we should be blamed, the majority allowing the minority to rule this country.
(8) Under current situation, just let the police and even the army to do their professional jobs. I would love to see, while doing so, they should just remain professional and not easily intimidated. Najib-Muhyiddin, I hope they remain focus to resolve our current economic problem. I have a strong believe, all these issues are wrt feeding one own pocket. But why should we allowed dirty hands of the minority to dirty the majority lives?
(9) I pray the police will remain professional, and hopefully with Allah blessing, there would be some hands from Him to curtail this unecessary disturbance to our peaceful lives.
Kuching, Sarawak
4 July, 2011
Popular
Tags
Videos
0 comments:
Post a Comment